Additional Office Locations
9277 Centre Pointe Drive, Suite 350 West Chester, Ohio 45069
You are currently browsing the archives for the truck accident injury claim category.
Archive for the ‘truck accident injury claim’ Category
Tuesday, November 6th, 2012
University Hospital in Cincinnati, Ohio is a first class trauma hospital. But in serious car accidents seconds matter. So the emergency helicopter transport system is vital. This ensures that victims get to the hospital timely so that there lives can be saved.
Multiple Emergency Helicopters Transport Hamilton Ohio Car Accident Pepsi Truck Victims
Recently six people were injured in a car truck crash at Knightsbridge Drive and University Boulevard on Hamilton’s East Side. All of them were flown by three medical helicopters to University Hospital in Cincinnati for traumatic injuries.
It was reported by the Hamilton Journal news that a Pepsi delivery truck stuck a Nissan Sentra in the rear. Hamilton police and Fire department rushed to the scene to save lives and investigate the accident.
The vehicles were traveling in an easterly direction on Knightsbridge Road. Names were not released as family members had not been contacted.
Pugh said the other three occupants in the car were transported by ambulance to Fort Hamilton and Mercy hospitals after they were extricated by firefighters using the Jaws of Life.
These few facts cause me as as car accident injury lawyer to think of several things.
The case of a rear end collision is governed by the traffic code. This is generally know as failure to keep an assured clear distance. The Pepsi.driver that struck the sentra in the rear would normally be negligent as a matter of law.
Since the driver was in the course and scope of his employment presumably Pepsi would also be responsible. It is likely they are self insured and trucking companies and large self insured corporations tend to be difficult to deal with as much or more so as insurance companies. Delay and defend can be the order of the day.
I wonder how many lawyers sent letters and chiropracters made phone calls soliciting the injured victim’s claims. Many times my car accident victims tell be they were appalled by what they felt to be ambulance chasing or an invasion of privacy by letters and calls they received. Although some people with no idea where to turn can be taken in by these solicitations.
For more information about truck accidents click here
Anthony Castelli Attorney represents injury victims in serious car truck accidents and other personal injury claims. With 30 years experience and over 25 civil injury trials he has the experience that has produced results. Call 513-621-2345 for a free consultation to get his legal help for your injury claim.
Saturday, November 5th, 2011
As a personal injury lawyer I know that crossing a train track is always dangerous. Many railroad crossings in the state of Ohio are unguarded . Just today a semi driver was miraculously not seriously injured when his truck stalled on the train tracks.
The semi driver was en route to West Chester and was hurt when his truck stalled on railroad tracks and his truck was hit by a slow-moving train. The accident happened around 5 p.m. Thursday. There was another man with the semi truck driver who excited the truck and tried to wave down the train.
Police say the semi was eastbound on Maple Avenue and from State Route 127 and tried to cross the tracks. The truck stalled, and the driver, 52-year-old Calvin Jennings, tried to back off the tracks. He was ejected from the cab when the train hit, and landed near the front left tire.
Jennings was taken to Miami Valley Hospital with non-life threatening injuries.
It is doubt full that there would be any responsibility on the part of the railroad. Although one might argue their negligence if they had time to stop.There are railroad injury cases that are the fault of the railroad. Some crossings in Ohio should have gates and lights but do not.
It is critical to slowly approach a grade crossing, especially the ones without gates and lights and limited visibility. It’s amazing how with the window up, the heater blowing and the radio on that the train whistle is just not all that of a warning.
Thursday, August 18th, 2011
A truck accident involving injury and death recently occurred on I-75 in Cincinnati. Here is how the story
was reported in the Cincinnati news. Note the emphasis on the fact that the person caused the wrongful death was not wearing a seatbelt nor was the passenger.
You may be wondering whether the fact that an injury victim or one caused a wrongful death forfeit their rights because of that . You may be surprised to know that failure to wear a seatbelt can potentially bar you from a claim for your injury. But that is why it’s important to hire a truck accident personal injury lawyer experienced with the seatbelt defense.
The TRUCK ACCIDENT WRONGFUL DEATH INJURY STORY
Police have reopened Northbound I-75 near Hopple Street after a fiery crash in which a man died. The highway was closed for nearly six hours while police investigated the circumstances surrounding the wreck.
Officers say 38 year old Nicholas Taylor was driving a Jeep north on I-75 when he lost control and hit a pickup truck driven by 46 year old Glen Delk. Delk was not wearing a seatbelt-he was partially thrown from the pickup and died at the scene. His passenger, 32 year old Kath Delk was also unbelted. She was caught inside the truck, which was on fire when officers arrived. They put out the flames and rescued her. She was taken to University Hospital with minor injuries and has since been released.
Taylor was wearing a seatbelt. He had minor injuries and was treated at the scene.
Alcohol and speed are both considered factors in the crash, although no charges have been filed.
HERE WERE SOME OF THE COMMENTS TO THE STORY REGARDING THE CAUSE OF THE
ACCIDENT DEATH INJURY AND SEATBELTS
” I don’t understand how people can actually say if he was wearing his seat belt he may still be alive? He wasn’t the one drinking and driving, I mean really he was just minding his own business when an idiot decided to get into his car drunk and drive down the expressway of all places and killed someone. My condolences goes to his family.
” It should be my choice to wear a seatbelt just like it’s the motorcyclist’s choice to wear a helmet. I agree that it is in the best interest of safety to wear the seat belt, but as I said it should be my choice. My condolences to the family.
“Don’t try blaming me for your personal choices…folks must start accepting responsilbility for their OWN actions and the consequences that go along with those poor choices/actions. The law and courts are still way too easy on drunk drivers! You can bet your bippy that I won’t be if your drunken ass is behind the wheel of a vehicle that harms me or mine. ”
“This is an example of WEAR YOUR SEATBELTS PEOPLE! Not only is it the law, but it can save your life. I don’t care how inconvienient you think it is… it is there for a reason. Let this sad tragedy be a lesson to everyone who doesn’t wear their seatbelt… My prayers to those involved. ”
” Hm here we go again blamin someone for some grown folks choice, a grown man chose to go to a bar if that’s the case, a grown man got behind the wheel of a automobile, a grown man chose to speed down the street. And it was grown people who didn’t have on seat belts. So therefore the bartender is at fault for not babysitting a grown man? I mean really anything for money?”
These comments are instructive to me a personal injury auto accident lawyer Several persons clearly blame the alleged drunk speeding truck driver. So do I. Others say the failure to wear a seat belt is just as much the cause of the injury and death from the drunk speeding truck driver.
Here’s the law in Ohio about the failure to wear a seat belt as being the cause of a truck car auto motor vehicle accident and the injury victim’s right to recover money compensation.
(F)(1) Subject to division (F)(2) of this section, the failure of a person to wear all of the available elements of a properly adjusted occupant restraining device in violation of division (B)(1) or (3) of this section or the failure of a person to ensure that each minor who is a passenger of an automobile being operated by that person is wearing all of the available elements of a properly adjusted occupant restraining device in violation of division (B)(2) of this section shall not be considered or used by the trier of fact in a tort action as evidence of negligence or contributory negligence. But, the trier of fact may determine based on evidence admitted consistent with the Ohio Rules of Evidence that the failure contributed to the harm alleged in the tort action and may diminish a recovery of compensatory damages that represents noneconomic loss, as defined in section 2307.011 of the Revised Code, in a tort action that could have been recovered but for the plaintiff’s failure to wear all of the available elements of a properly adjusted occupant restraining device. Evidence of that failure shall not be used as a basis for a criminal prosecution of the person other than a prosecution for a violation of this section; and shall not be admissible as evidence in a criminal action involving the person other than a prosecution for a violation of this section.
What that means is that if a seat belt could have prevented the injury you can not recover for anything other than monetary loss. You can get your lost wages and medical bills paid , but that’s it. That’s why it’s important to hire an attorney that knows the law and the evidentiary priniciples and the experts to hire to overcome this defense. Just because you did not have a seat belt on does not mean your injury would not have occured. I just concluded a case where the failure to wear a seatbelt was raised by the insurance company.I hired one of the best experts in the country and he proved that the seat belt would not have made any difference.
If you have a truck auto or other motor vehicle injury i will gladly give you a free case evaluation . Just call me at 1-800-447-6549 or fill in the form to email me and I will personally answer your questions.
"Your office has been nothing but good to us! From our very first phone call to the very end, you were there to listen. You have been a fantastic attorney. We were undoubtedly going to lose everything we had because of the accident, but you made sure we were taken care of!! We are no longer worried about losing our home, and it's because of you! My family is back on track! Words cannot express how much we appreciate everything you did for us. I know you will be a blessing to a lot more people!" With love,
Morris & Jennifer Smith